Septimus Heap Book I: Magyk
Man, I don't know what's wrong with me, but lately I've been so critical of the books I read. And normally I'm very forgiving. I don't know if it's the mood I'm in, or if I've just gotten more sensitive, but lately everything I read is crap! I just keep thinking, did they have an editor? Did the author even read the book after they were done writing it? My cat could've written a better book than this!
So, after that little rant, I must admit that what I just said doesn't actually apply to Septimus Heap. Or, not really, anyway. Cuz I actually enjoyed the book. I do have a few criticisms, however. I thought that there were a few holes in the plot, some plot lines or characters that could have been developed more fully, and a couple of characters which were just extraneous (y'all know what a fan I am of tight plots). And the biggest flaw was that the author just didn't do a good job of explaining how the magic works. I mean, I know it's magic, and it doesn't have to follow any known laws of the physical universe. But, in fantasy worlds, magic usually does have rules which must be followed and make sense within that world. The author tried several times to explain how it worked, and I was still like, Huh? And non-wizards seem to be able to perform spells, so what's the point of being a wizard??? I dunno. There is another book in the series so maybe that will explain some of the discrepancies.
But, like I said, although the afore-mentioned inconsistencies occasionally annoyed me, on the whole I still liked the book. And I stayed up until 2 in the morning to finish it, so they must've done something right, right?
1 Comments:
Just a note on the editor stuff: I've been hearing more and more regarding the lack of editing in books not only by readers but by writers too. There are fewer editors at large publishing houses these days and, consequently, have bigger work loads. This is a big reason why alot of writers choose smaller publishing houses nowadays -- more personal and constructive attention. Your quip regarding if an editor looks at this book may be, in some way, valid.
However, self-published books are still looked down upon because of the lack of a qualified editor involved in the process. In essence, self-published books lack the standardization inherent in the regular publishing world. Perhaps, as you are witnessing (as most of us are), the decline of this standard.
Post a Comment
<< Home