Tuesday, March 14, 2006

What are Daemons and Dust?

Puddleglum has asked the question that I think is central to understanding this book. What are daemons and how are they related to dust? To answer this question, I think it is important to go back to the epigraph at the beginning of the book. An epigraph sets the theme for an entire book, so I think it reveals a lot about Pullman's intentions when he wrote the book.

The epigraph is from John Milton's Paradise Lost. Paradise Lost is an epic poem written in the 17th century about Adam and Eve's fall from grace. I have actually never read it myself. If you want to know what it's all about, I suggest the Cliff's Notes version.

The epigraph itself is taken from Book II. In Book II, Satan and the other Fallen Angels in hell have decided that in order to get back at God, they should try to corrupt God's newest creation: Man. Satan then begins his journey to heaven (in order to reach Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden). On his way, he must pass through the realm of Chaos and Night, the companions that inhabit the void that separates Hell from Heaven. The void is described as follows:

a dark
Illimitable Ocean without bound,
Without dimension, where length, breadth, and highth,
And time and place are lost; where eldest Night
And CHAOS, Ancestors of Nature, hold
Eternal ANARCHIE, amidst the noise
Of endless warrs and by confusion stand.


In the epigraph it is this void that Satan contemplates as he stands at the gates of hell:

Into this wild abyss,
The womb of nature and perhaps her grave,
Of neither sea, nor shore, nor air, nor fire,
But all these in their preganant causes mixed
Confusedly, and which thus must ever fight,
Unless the almighty maker them ordain
His dark materials to create more worlds,
Into this wild abyss the wary fiend
Stood on the brink of hell and looked a while,
Pondering his voyage...


So to my point: what is dust? I think Dust comes from the realm of Night and Chaos. The realm is described as being of neither sea, nor shore, nor air, nor fire (as in none of the four elements) but rather a chaotic mixture of all of them. The realm is also described as a place where the normal rules of nature "length, breadth, and highth, And time and place are lost." Dust is described several times as being an elementary particle, but one that does not behave in the same manner as any other elementary particle. The realm is also described as having something to do with creation. In the first quotation, Night and Chaos are described as "Ancestors of Nature" as in the parents, or creators of Nature itself. In the epigraph, the void is also described as the "womb of nature" which would also indicate that this chaotic void is the source of life and creation. It then basically says that the void is doomed to remain in confusion and chaos "Unless the almighty maker them ordain / His dark materials to create more worlds". As in, these are the materials that God used to create the world with. And let us not forget the title of the series: "His Dark Materials..." So the entire series is about "His Dark Materials..." aka "Dust" aka the source of all life.

Now we should not forget about what the rest of Paradise Lost is all about: the fall of Adam and Eve. Basically, that's what the Christian church comes down to, isn't it? Adam and Eve ate from the tree of knowledge and they were no longer naive: they knew about sex and love, those wonderful things, but they also knew about hate and jealousy and shame, and all those bad things. Now, I personally think that the whole Adam and Eve story is a misogynistic piece of crap (yeah, women are the cause of all sin in the world, we are evil, not to mention easily influenced by smooth talking serpents). BUT, I think it says something interesting, if you choose to interpret it in the way that I think Pullman chooses to interpret it. If you go back to the epigraph, it says the void is "The womb of nature and perhaps her grave" [emphasis mine]. Now, I can't speak for Milton, but what I think Pullman means is that Dust is life, but also death: the good and the bad. Dust is like the fruit of the tree of knowledge. You gotta take the good with the bad. If you're going to live, then there will be death. Before Adam and Eve ate of the Tree of Knowledge, they were like those nurses and doctors at Bolvangar. They were living, they were thinking, but they couldn't really feel anything. No passion, no moral outrage at what they were doing, nothing. They were just obediant little puppets. This is what Adam and Eve were before the fall.

Now the church has figured that Dust is the physical evidence of original sin. Children are innocent and naive (like Adam and Eve were) before puberty. But when puberty arrives, they begin to experience passions and feelings that were not there before, they begin to think for themselves, and their true personalities emerge for better or for worse (this being represented by the final form of the daemon). This is when they begin to know things. Now, because this is when Daemons choose their final form, the Church figures that these two things seem to be linked. Perhaps if they sever the linkage, then it will be as if original sin never happened. And I think they're right; BUT what the church doesn't get, is that original sin is LIFE. Without the Daemon, and hence without Dust, the person is like an empty shell, devoid of anything, good OR bad.

So that's my take on it. I'm not sure if I quite understand in my own mind exactly what part of us that a Daemon is supposed to represent, but that's a start anyway. What do you all think?

2 Comments:

At 10:27, Blogger Garden Girl said...

Thank you, Violette, for putting into words what was just a big jumble in my head.

One other thing that is mentioned, for Lord Asriel, is the 'energy' potential of the bond between daemon and person, which was his whole purpose in the book, to get to the other universe. The professors at the college tried to kill him so he couldn't do this, and they wanted to stop him because of what it would do to the 'dust' or energy of the universe. But I'm not quite clear on what their take on dust was as related to energy, and what Lord Asriel's actions would mean to the physical world, if Dust were to be disturbed or changed. And I"m also confused about how dust related to pre and post adolescence, in amount, there is more dust that surrounds a pre adolescent, which seems to mean greater energy in the bond between child and daemon than adult and daemon, and that's why they where experimenting on children. It seems to me that there is a lot of emphasis on physical energy and how it relates to dust, and it seems to mirror how we on earth theorize that we can harness atomic energy (splitting atoms rather than life forms) to realize Einstein's theory of relativity to achieve time travel.

If dust is the atomic energy of the universe, and people are comprised of it, and we disturb it, what would happen? And how does THIS relate to wrong and right, sin and knowledge. Dust would have to be more than energy, it would also have to have memory, and perhaps intention?

 
At 11:33, Blogger LilyMab said...

Sorry it's taken me a bit longer to jump in this time - I've had a nasty bout with the flu.

I am less versed in Paradise Lost, so I've been relying on my knowledge of The Bible to interpret Pullman's meaning. Violette's decoding helped out a lot. Like Violette, I think that Dust is "the source of all life." However, I would take her point that "Dust is like the fruit of the tree of knowledge" a bit farther and posit that Dust actually is knowledge or understanding of self.

Adolescence is the time when most people start to formulate who they are as individuals and gain real understanding of themselves and the world around them. They lose childhood's innocence. In The Bible, when Adam and Eve gain this knowledge from the apple, they also gain original sin. Dust, I think, actually is the physical evidence of this change at adolescence. Hence, the Church's reaction to it. The Daemon's choosing of a true form is also evidence of this change - the soul is recognizing it's true self. The soul has accumulated enough knowledge of itself and the world around it (aka sin) to find it's true place and settle into adulthood.

Severing the bond between body and soul (individual and daemon) would therefore theoretically separate this knowledge (sin) from the individual.

I agree with Violette - original sin is LIFE. Knowledge begets individuality and choice and this is truly what makes humans human. I am also liking the idea that humans are created from Dust - humans are made of knowledge.

So, if knowledge is sin, and sin is what makes humans human, then what does this say about sin? Is it actually bad? Is knowledge and choice wrong? Theologically, this book opens up an entire world to think about. I'm surprised it hasn't been banned by somebody yet. :)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home